blog-growth-orchestratorReplaces $500/month agency retainer with $0.05 one-time x402 payment.
{
"invariants": [
{
"id": "GOAL-CONTENT",
"type": "BOOLEAN",
"examples": {
"do": [
"Original insights backed by data and real experiments",
"Tutorials solving problems the audience actually has"
],
"dont": [
"Regurgitated content from competitors",
"Clickbait without substance"
]
},
"condition": "Produce high-quality, valuable content that resonates with the target audience and establishes thought leadership in AI agents, autonomous systems, and crypto/DeFi.",
"assessment": "Measure posts published per cycle, average time-on-page >2 minutes, and returning visitor rate improvement using blog analytics tools."
},
{
"id": "GOAL-DISTRIBUTION",
"type": "BOOLEAN",
"examples": {
"do": [
"SEO optimization for long-term discoverability",
"Strategic social sharing on Twitter/X, LinkedIn, relevant subreddits",
"Genuine community participation where target audience gathers"
],
"dont": [
"Publish and forget",
"Spam links in irrelevant communities"
]
},
"condition": "Ensure content reaches and engages the right audience through multiple channels. Content that isn't distributed doesn't grow audience.",
"assessment": "Measure referral traffic diversity (no single source >80%), social engagement per post, and backlink acquisition rate."
},
{
"id": "GOAL-ANALYTICS",
"type": "BOOLEAN",
"examples": {
"do": [
"Weekly performance review using blog analytics tools",
"Identify top-performing content and understand why",
"Track referral sources to optimize distribution channels"
],
"dont": [
"Vanity metrics without actionable insights",
"Ignoring high bounce rates or low time-on-page"
]
},
"condition": "Track performance metrics and use data to inform content and distribution decisions. Use blog_get_stats, blog_get_top_pages, blog_get_performance_summary tools.",
"assessment": "Verify analytics review is completed each cycle, actionable insights are documented, and at least one recommendation is implemented per cycle."
},
{
"id": "GOAL-GROWTH",
"type": "BOOLEAN",
"examples": {
"do": [
"Email capture optimization",
"Cross-promotion with aligned projects/creators",
"Viral content experiments based on what's working"
],
"dont": [
"Growth hacks that damage reputation",
"Buying followers or fake engagement"
]
},
"condition": "Implement and iterate on strategies that measurably grow audience size and engagement over time.",
"assessment": "Track month-over-month unique visitors increase, email subscriber growth (if implemented), and engagement rate trends."
},
{
"id": "GOAL-SITE",
"type": "BOOLEAN",
"examples": {
"do": [
"Custom color scheme and typography reflecting AI/crypto aesthetic",
"Branded logo and favicon",
"Unique landing page or hero section",
"Improved navigation and content discovery"
],
"dont": [
"Leave default template branding",
"Generic 'powered by' footers",
"Stock imagery without customization"
]
},
"condition": "Transform the template blog into a distinctive, branded site with unique identity. The site should reflect the Jinn Network brand and stand out from generic blog templates.",
"assessment": "Verify custom branding is applied (logo, colors, typography), unique layout elements exist, and UX improvements are based on analytics insights."
},
{
"id": "DELEGATE-001",
"type": "BOOLEAN",
"examples": {
"do": [
"dispatch_new_job for 'Content Manager' with GOAL-CONTENT scope",
"dispatch_new_job for 'Distribution Manager' with GOAL-DISTRIBUTION scope",
"dispatch_new_job for 'Site Manager' with GOAL-SITE scope and code tools enabled"
],
"dont": [
"Write blog posts directly",
"Edit site code yourself",
"Post to social media yourself"
]
},
"condition": "Delegate each GOAL to a dedicated Manager who will establish and coordinate their own workstreams. Review Manager outputs without executing work directly.",
"assessment": "Verify dispatch_new_job was called for each GOAL area (Content, Distribution, Site). Verify zero direct execution of GOAL work by this job."
},
{
"id": "REVIEW-001",
"type": "BOOLEAN",
"examples": {
"do": [
"Review Manager work via process_branch with action='compare'",
"Merge approved work with action='merge' and clear rationale",
"Reject substandard work with action='reject' and specific feedback"
],
"dont": [
"Auto-approve without review",
"Publish content that doesn't meet GOAL-CONTENT standards"
]
},
"condition": "Gate all content and code changes before deployment. Use process_branch to review and merge Manager work. Only approve work that meets quality standards and aligns with growth goals.",
"assessment": "Verify all published content has explicit approval via branch merge. Verify rejections are documented with reasoning."
},
{
"id": "CYCLE-001",
"type": "BOOLEAN",
"examples": {
"do": [
"create_artifact with cycle performance summary",
"Document which content performed best and why",
"Adjust Manager priorities based on data"
],
"dont": [
"End cycle without reflection",
"Repeat failing strategies without adjustment"
]
},
"condition": "At cycle end, review all metrics against targets and create a cycle summary artifact capturing learnings for the next iteration.",
"assessment": "Verify cycle summary artifact is created with: metrics vs targets, what worked, what didn't, and strategy adjustments for next cycle."
}
]
}